I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 as the main-stream news have actually guaranteed very people that are few the detail of this “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested within the united kingdom in the beginning since there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Look at this and also you will know why.
One other thing maybe maybe maybe not widely comprehended can there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, most of the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no media. The only real general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. Which means you never would get to comprehend exactly just exactly how clearly the full instance is just a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You will find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps away at me – and which strangely We have maybe not seen asked any place else – is this:
Why did Anna Ardin perhaps maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the group that is swedish Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had used into the front row of Assange’s press conference. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being intending to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply in search of Assange:
“He’s maybe maybe not right here. He’s planned to own intercourse using the cashmere woman every night, although not managed to make it. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she was in fact sexually assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been prepared to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She ended up being additionally to convey that this assault included enforced sex that is unprotected she ended up being worried about HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex on the and also this might have sent HIV, why did she make no try to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was at threat of her life? And why ended up being Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to friends, without any evident disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Let’s fit that into an extremely brief survey associated with the whole relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press meeting organised with a branch associated with the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual intercourse, regarding the first day’s conference. Ardin afterwards alleges this converted into assault by surreptitious mutilation regarding the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him regarding the dais at their press seminar. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anyone have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to locate a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian seem good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick to me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless in the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting outdoors at 02:00 and barely freezing utilizing the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, rest once again in the exact same solitary sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following couple of days. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they don’t. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep into the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of possible sexual attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is focused on STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had non-safe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some days later on: Ardin creates a broken condom to your authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment finds no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead not to ever whine of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is ordinary any particular one of a couple of things took place:
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but neglected to alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing repeated provides to support him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the usage of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She discussed with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale as a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape guidelines. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any fees against JA but the authorities desired to control him. ”
At 17.26 she texted that she had been “shocked once they arrested JA because we just desired him to have a test”.
The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it ended up being law enforcement who fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then made her very own tale of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she had been sex with Assange, she could perhaps not claim sex that is non-consensual. Therefore she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event of this torn condom. However the condom that is torn produced does not have any trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be a liar. On her behalf tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which can be, within the sense that is literal amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say incredibly poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all of this detail xhamsterlive free account. Rape studies in Sweden are held completely in secret. There is absolutely no jury, in addition to federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental parties. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Secondly, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data is really so weak, as merely to cry rape would be to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The facts associated with the tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to consider the data. If you’re not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how will you learn that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that the best way to test these things is with in court, i’d state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, so we should positively condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.
3 personas lo han visto, 1 hoy